scroll to top
Loading icon
0

Mobile Menu

Header Layout

EBSCO Auth Banner

Let's find your institution. Click here.

Page title

Advanced Search Results For "SYSTEMATIC reviews"

1 - 10 of 194,342 results for
 "SYSTEMATIC reviews"
Results per page:

Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):Heart & lung : the journal of critical care [Heart Lung] 2022 May-Jun; Vol. 53, pp. 32-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 03.

Abstract:Methodological transparency and reproducibility are essential for systematic reviews. Peer review of systematic review manuscripts ensures researchers achieve transparency and reproducibility. Using critical appraisal and quality assessment tools is a ...

View details

Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2022 May 19; Vol. 12 (5), pp. e058428. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 19.

Abstract:Introduction: Since the turn of the millennium, recovery has become mainstream in mental health services across much of the Western world. Resulting from this, many jurisdictions, including Ireland, have created frameworks and policies to support its i...

View details

In silico approaches for drug repurposing in oncology: Protocol for a scoping review of existing evidence.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):PloS one [PLoS One] 2022 Jul 07; Vol. 17 (7), pp. e0271002. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 07 (Print Publication: 2022).

Abstract:Drug repurposing has been applied in the biomedical field to optimize the use of existing drugs, leading to a more efficient allocation of research resources. In oncology, this approach is particularly interesting, considering the high cost related to ...

View details

The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2022 Jul; Vol. 227 (1), pp. 43-50.e4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Feb 01.

Abstract:Objective: Gender-based bias during journal peer review can lead to publication biases and perpetuate gender inequality in science. Double-blind peer review, in which the names of authors and reviewers are masked, may present an opportunity for scienti...

View details

The Campbell Collaboration's systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards.

Publication Type:Editorial & Opinion

Source(s):Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2022 Jul 18; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 145. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 18.

Abstract:Background: Many published reviews do not meet the widely accepted PRISMA standards for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Campbell Collaboration and Cochrane reviews are expected to meet even more rigorous standards, but their adherence to these st...

View details

When is the evidence conclusive? Analysis of systematic reviews for which Cochrane declared that conclusions will not change with further studies.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):Research synthesis methods [Res Synth Methods] 2022 Jul; Vol. 13 (4), pp. 478-488. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 22.

Abstract:Some Cochrane reviews were declared stable or closed, that is, not in need of updating. For some of them, it has been declared that conclusions will not (or it is unlikely they will) change with further studies. We explored whether there is a discernab...

View details

Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2022 Jun 13; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 121. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 13.

Abstract:Background: Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments are important tools in the evidence-based selection of these instruments. COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) has developed a comprehen...

View details

Automating risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a real-time mixed methods comparison of human researchers to a machine learning system.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):BMC medical research methodology [BMC Med Res Methodol] 2022 Jun 08; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 167. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 08.

Abstract:Background: Machine learning and automation are increasingly used to make the evidence synthesis process faster and more responsive to policymakers' needs. In systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), risk of bias assessment is a resou...

View details

High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low-quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high-quality evidence.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):Journal of evaluation in clinical practice [J Eval Clin Pract] 2022 Jun; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 353-362. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 28.

Abstract:Rationale, Aims, and Objectives: It is generally believed that evidence from low quality of evidence generate inaccurate estimates about treatment effects more often than evidence from high (certainty) quality evidence (CoE). As a result, we would expe...

View details

Protocol for a scoping review of sepsis epidemiology.

Publication Type:Academic Journal

Source(s):Systematic reviews [Syst Rev] 2022 Jun 19; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 125. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 19.

Abstract:Introduction: Sepsis is a common, life-threatening syndrome of physiologic, pathologic, and biochemical abnormalities that are caused by infection and propagated by a dysregulated immune response. In 2017, the estimated annual incidence of sepsis aroun...

View details

banner_970x250 (970x250)

sponsored